Photographers today are faced with a rising tide that is eroding their businesses. Worse than this force though is their reaction to it.
Several times a week, I read Facebook posts or online articles from fellow photogs ranting about an editor or art director who asked them to use their photo for free, with a mere “credit line” or “exposure” as worthy compensation.
It’s easy to understand why this is frustrating.
In days gone by, it wasn’t uncommon for a photographer to earn tens of thousand of dollars over the life of a single image by licensing it to many buyers with many applications. Apply that to a steady stock of individual images over a career, and you’re talking about a valid income.
But increasingly this cash cow is being slaughtered at the hands of stingy editors, so say many photographers.
Yet the problem is not so much the editors, art directors, etc., as it is the growing number of amateur, albeit talented shooters that give editors copious reasons to expect to pay little or nothing for photography. The thing is, as soon as a photographer (rightly so, I should say) tells the editor, “no – you can’t have my work for free,” the editor will go somewhere else online and find a comparable image that is free. And who loses? If I’m a editor, also faced with a shrinking magazine industry, it makes perfect economic sense to me to find and use free images.
If you were hungry for beef and one restaurant offered filet mignon for $30 but another joint just down the road offered a nice flank steak for free, where would you go?
Of course, many people do recognize supreme quality and are willing to pay for it. But I would argue that most people, editors and dinners alike, would opt for a good deal.
Certainly, I’m not condoning the rapid erosion of our photography industry and the ensuing extraction of revenue from it, but we have to see it for what it is.
This same thing happened to painters in the 19th century when, of all people, photographers began sweeping their commissions out from under them. No more was painting the desired commercial medium. Much like the demise of typesetters in the dawn of the digital age.
“Type-who?”
The truth is – and we have to come to terms with this – the tide has turned and we are not going to change buyer behavior.
We’re better off – much better off – spending our energy adjusting our business models to fit this new paradigm. Just because the old model is dying on the vine doesn’t mean the artisan must perish with it.
And really, this is happening across all of industry, not just photography.
Because industry continues to change vastly, we too have to think vastly different about our economic models.
We need to create entirely new models to replace the aging ones. Simply put, we need to innovate – and we need to start today.
Rather than being swept away by the changing tide, we can instead learn to read it – and ride it.